Keep the judgment. Remove the repetition
Evidmark separates repeatable grading work from decisions that belong to the teaching team.
The score begins with source evidence
Each proposed decision stays beside the relevant response region and rubric criterion.
Our unique process
We make sure every grade is traceable, consistent, and remains approved by you.
-
01
Approve the framework first
Criteria, point allocations, and expected responses are reviewed before grading begins.
-
02
Ground every proposed score
Each score links to the student response, applicable criterion, and grading rationale.
-
03
Route exceptions by reason
Missing, conflicting, or ambiguous evidence reaches the teaching team with a stated cause.
-
04
Apply revisions across the batch
Approved rubric changes reevaluate completed and remaining work while preserving prior decisions.
The assessment framework remains consistent
Change the rubric without splitting the batch
Every decision remains attached to the rubric version that produced it. A teaching-team change applies backward and forward only after approval.
- 01Calibrate first5 samples
Inspect five provisional grades before the full batch begins.
- 02Approve the revisionv2 approved
A TA or instructor confirms the changed criterion and point rule.
- 03Archive replaced decisionshistory kept
Prior Q3b results remain inspectable instead of being overwritten.
- 04Return affected work to gradingQ3b queued
Only impacted questions move back to the grading queue.
- 05Apply one approved framework to the batch42 aligned
Previous and ungraded submissions are evaluated under rubric v2.
Grades cannot leave Evidmark until rubric migration and required review are complete.
Follow one assignment through the system
See where automation stops, where the teaching team steps in, and what remains inspectable.